VMware Fusion vs Parallels: Windows Server 2008 Install
0 Comments Published by mike January 16th, 2009 in TechnologyOh my, no contest.
Fusion installed approximately 50% faster than Parallels. In fact, I think Win2K8 installs faster virtually (ESX, ESXi, Fusion, and Parallels) faster than on native hardware via standard DVDROM.
Not much more to say, was just an unexpected outcome/observation.
No Responses to “VMware Fusion vs Parallels: Windows Server 2008 Install”
Please Wait
Leave a Reply
You must log in to post a comment.