Again, the people at Apple Matters do get it wrong…again.
Once the furor had subsided, people started thinking about virtualization.
Well, again, a day late, and a dollar short.
Why do the people at Apple Matters make such broad stroke comments? It is as if they want their intended audience to be stupid or at least ignorant. I need to figure out why I read their webpage.
it isn’t as if we do not already we have Parallels Workstation for Mac OSX Intel in beta (currently beta4) that works very well in my tests. No need to dual boot via Apple’s Boot Camp, and the ability to run other operating systems is the extra bonus that makes it worth the small amount of cash required for puchase worth while.
With time, we should see more virtualization projects coming down the pipe.
I have not run it yet under the other supported host operating systems (Windows XP and Linux kernel based systems), as I really don’t need to. For enterprise virtualization, I have VMWare already, and Xen is starting to look good as well.
EDIT: Oh, perhaps Chris Siebold just hates anyone with their own brain and the ability to think for themselves by referencing users as moronic luddites - look at this…
Perhaps he feels that the hate must continue and that allowing users the ability to do more with their computers (even if it is Windows based applications) is something tantamount to insanity, or perhaps Windows based systems killed his puppy. Who knows, but the stupidity seems to be unending. Please, keep posting Mr. Siebold, you can always get another puppy.